By Ghana: Prophet Ebo Noah Detained Over “End of World” Claims
Ghana: Prophet Ebo Noah Detained Over “End of World” Claims
A self-styled religious leader in Ghana, known as Prophet Ebo Noah, has been formally charged following a series of controversial public statements that authorities say triggered widespread public alarm. The case has become a focal point for discussions regarding the legal responsibilities of religious figures in the digital age.
Legal Charges and Remand
Prophet Ebo Noah appeared in court this week to answer to charges of publishing false news and inciting public fear and panic. These legal actions stem from his widely circulated predictions regarding a global apocalypse, which law enforcement claims breached public order acts designed to maintain national stability.
Following the initial hearing, the presiding judge ordered that Noah be remanded in police custody for a period of two weeks. This detention period is intended to provide investigators with sufficient time to document the full scope of the public disturbance and gather evidence from digital platforms where the claims originated.
Mandatory Psychiatric Assessment
In a significant development, the court also mandated that Ebo Noah undergo a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation. This medical assessment is a critical step in the judicial process, aimed at determining the prophet’s mental state and assessing his fitness to stand trial. The results will likely influence whether the case proceeds as a criminal matter or a mental health intervention.
Background on the Controversy
The legal crackdown follows a viral campaign where Noah asserted that the world would end on December 25, 2025. These claims, disseminated through social media and public sermons, reportedly caused significant distress among vulnerable populations.
The incident highlights a growing trend of authorities holding “prophetic” figures accountable for statements that may lead to social unrest. The outcome of this trial is expected to set a legal precedent for how the state balances the right to religious expression with the necessity of public safety and the prevention of mass hysteria.
